Home of The JavaSpecialists' Newsletter

241bConcurrency Puzzle Helpful Hints

Posted: 2016-10-04Category: ConcurrencyJava Version: 1.6+Dr. Heinz M. Kabutz
 

Abstract: In the previous newsletter, we sent out a threading puzzle for you to solve. Here are some hints to help you figure out what is going on.

 

A big thank you to all those who already emailed me their solution to last week's puzzle. Most of the answers were correct in theory, but wrong in practice :-) It is in my experience better to learn by doing, rather than watching someone else. So you will get more benefits from attempting to solve it than from reading my solution. So if you have not tried yet or if you got stuck in your efforts, here are some helpful hints:

1. We can argue correctness by using the Java Memory Model (JMM). However, most of the concurrency bugs that you can get with happens-before, early writes, visibility, etc. are very hard to reproduce. We certainly would find a hard time writing a test that fails with such consistency as this one. That's the first hint.

2. Second hint is to never believe what your customers are telling you is the problem. The explanation with System.arraycopy() is clearly a "red herring". To be fair, Jack did send it to me as a possible explanation. However, I didn't look at the code of System.arraycopy() as I didn't really believe the reason for the failure would be found there. So you can ignore System.arraycopy(). You can verify that even if you start with a larger array of 1000, it still fails.

3. Whenever we try to solve concurrency bugs, we have to be able to reproduce the error first. This might mean looking for other hardware that exhibits the problem (that's what I did). Once you see it happening, change the code a bit at a time and see if it still occurs.

4. Last hint. The solution to this puzzle is unbelievably simple. Really, any Java programmer can solve it, not just the concurrency elite. There is one side effect that is forbidden in Swift 3 and which causes the race condition. 'nough hints ;-)

I also suggested that you use StampedLock to code this correctly. Admittedly that is a bit more difficult than solving the puzzle. StampedLock contains three idioms in the JavaDoc comments that you can use as a basis for add(), remove() and get(). Once you have done it, please email it to me and you'll get an opportunity to contribute to our solution and get your name in the credits.

Kind regards

Heinz

 

Comments

We are always happy to receive comments from our readers. Feel free to send me a comment via email or discuss the newsletter in our JavaSpecialists Slack Channel (Get an invite here)

Related Articles

Browse the Newsletter Archive

About the Author

Heinz Kabutz Java Conference Speaker

Java Champion, author of the Javaspecialists Newsletter, conference speaking regular... About Heinz

Superpack 2018

Superpack 2018 Our entire Java Specialists Training in one huge bundle more...
Java Training

We deliver relevant courses, by top Java developers to produce more resourceful and efficient programmers within their organisations.

Java Consulting

We can help make your Java application run faster and trouble-shoot concurrency and performance bugs...

Java Emergency?

If your system is down, we will review it for 15 minutes and give you our findings for just 1 € without any obligation.