Abstract: When iterating over a heterogeneous collection, one way to differentiate between object types is with instanceof. Another way is to create a special visitor object that can be applied to the objects in the collection.
Welcome to the 40th edition of The Java(tm) Specialists' Newsletter, sent to over 2550 Java experts in over 70 countries. Despite my plea that you don't unsubscribe, I had a rather surprising number of unsubscriptions, as programmers expressed their outrage at my audacity by voting with their feet. My views are my own and that of my employer - since I am my own employer ;-). I'm working on a program at the moment and I do make sure that our JavaDocs are up to date by running a Doclet that tells me where I've forgotten a tag. Whenever I change a method, I nuke the comments, and then the Doclet tells me where I need to add a comment again.
The ideas in this newsletter were spawned by Inigo Surguy (inigosurguy@hotmail.com) who works in Lemington Spa in the United Kingdom. Inigo is the UK Head of Research and Development of Interactive AG. Inigo also pointed out BCEL to me, used to change byte code "on the fly". I will write about some application of that in future.
javaspecialists.teachable.com: Please visit our new self-study course catalog to see how you can upskill your Java knowledge.
Warning: the comparator we use in this code is not implemented according to the specification. It can happen that the elements are stored out of order. A more complicated matching mechanism needs to be used to dispatch to the correct methods.
I'm getting tired. Not tired of writing newsletters, but tired of Java. Tired of writing the same code over and over again. For example:
// ... Iterator it = ages.iterator(); while(it.hasNext()) { Integer age = (Integer)it.next(); System.out.println("Now you're " + age + ", in 3 years time, you'll be " + (age.intValue() + 3)); }
I don't like that while
loop with the iterator.
Don't know why I don't like it, it just looks inelegant to
me. I like the weird for
loop for an iterator even
less:
// ... for(Iterator it = ages.iterator(); it.hasNext();) { Integer age = (Integer)it.next(); System.out.println("Now you're " + age + ", in 3 years time, you'll be " + (age.intValue() + 3)); }
Lastly, I don't like downcasting and I don't like the problems that occur when you have different types in a collection.
Before looking at a solution, I would like to show how I would use iterators normally:
import java.util.*; public class OldVisitingIteratorTest { public static void main(String[] args) { Collection c = new LinkedList(); for (int i=0; i<3; i++) c.add(new Integer(i)); Iterator it = c.iterator(); while(it.hasNext()) { // lots of brackets - looks almost like Lisp - argh System.out.println(((Integer)it.next()).intValue() + 10); } c.add(new Float(2.1)); c.add("Hello"); it = c.iterator(); while(it.hasNext()) { Object o = it.next(); if (o instanceof Integer) { System.out.println(((Integer)o).intValue() + 10); } else if (o instanceof Number) { System.out.println(((Number)o).intValue() + 20); } else if (o instanceof String) { System.out.println(((String)o).toLowerCase()); } else { System.out.println(o); } } it = c.iterator(); while(it.hasNext()) { System.out.println(((Integer)it.next()).intValue() + 10); } } }
The output from that code is:
10 11 12 10 11 12 22 hello 10 11 12 Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Float at OldVisitingIteratorTest.main(OldVisitingIteratorTest.java:32)
Instead of constructing an Iterator and going through the Iterator and doing some operation on its contents, why not pass in an object with an execute() method that is called with each element? After some speed-typing yesterday, while waiting for my students at a Design Patterns course at the Strand Beach Hotel near Cape Town to finish an exercise, I came up with:
import java.util.*; import java.lang.reflect.*; public class VisitingIterator { /** * Ordering methods in "best-fit" order. */ private static final Comparator METHOD_COMPARATOR = new Comparator() { public int compare(Object o1, Object o2) { Class paramType1 = ((Method)o1).getParameterTypes()[0]; Class paramType2 = ((Method)o2).getParameterTypes()[0]; return paramType1.isAssignableFrom(paramType2) ? 1 : -1; } }; /** * Threadsafe version of visit. * @param lock the object on which to synchronize * @param task is an Object with an execute(...) : void method */ public void visit(Collection c, Object task, Object lock) { synchronized(lock) { visit(c, task); } } /** * @param task is an Object with an execute(...) : void method */ public void visit(Collection c, Object task) { TreeSet methods = new TreeSet(METHOD_COMPARATOR); Method[] ms = task.getClass().getMethods(); for (int i=0; i<ms.length; i++) { if (ms[i].getName().equals("execute") && ms[i].getParameterTypes().length == 1) { methods.add(ms[i]); } } Iterator it = c.iterator(); while(it.hasNext()) { boolean found = false; Object o = it.next(); Iterator mit = methods.iterator(); while(!found && mit.hasNext()) { Method m = (Method)mit.next(); if (m.getParameterTypes()[0].isInstance(o)) { try { m.invoke(task, new Object[] { o }); } catch(IllegalAccessException ex) { // we were only looking for public methods anyway throw new IllegalStateException(); } catch(InvocationTargetException ex) { // The only exceptions we allow to be thrown from // execute are RuntimeException subclases throw (RuntimeException)ex.getTargetException(); } found = true; } } if (!found) throw new IllegalArgumentException( "No handler found for object type " + o.getClass().getName()); } } }
Instead of having that ugly while
loop, we can now
pass an object to the VisitingIterator and the correct
execute(...)
method is called for each element
in the collection. The OldVisitingIterator now becomes:
import java.util.*; public class VisitingIteratorTest { public static void main(String[] args) { Collection c = new LinkedList(); for (int i=0; i<3; i++) c.add(new Integer(i)); VisitingIterator vit = new VisitingIterator(); vit.visit(c, new Object() { public void execute(Integer i) { System.out.println(i.intValue() + 10); } }); c.add(new Float(2.1)); c.add("Hello"); vit.visit(c, new Object() { public void execute(Object o) { System.out.println(o); } public void execute(Number n) { System.out.println(n.intValue() + 20); } public void execute(Integer i) { System.out.println(i.intValue() + 10); } public void execute(String s) { System.out.println(s.toLowerCase()); } }); vit.visit(c, new Object() { public void execute(Integer i) { System.out.println(i.intValue() + 10); } }); } }
The output from our new style is:
10 11 12 10 11 12 22 hello 10 11 12 Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: No handler found for object type java.lang.Float at VisitingIterator.visit(VisitingIterator.java:62) at VisitingIteratorTest.main(VisitingIteratorTest.java:33)
Perhaps I've been smoking Java for too long, but I much prefer
that code to the while(it.hasNext()) ...
but I have
not had the chance to try this idea out "in the real world". I
will start using it and let you know if it makes code neater
(or not). I know that it will be less efficient, but then, Java
is so slow anyway, I'd rather have cool style than super-optimal
code.
Until next week ...
Heinz
We are always happy to receive comments from our readers. Feel free to send me a comment via email or discuss the newsletter in our JavaSpecialists Slack Channel (Get an invite here)
We deliver relevant courses, by top Java developers to produce more resourceful and efficient programmers within their organisations.